Deductive essays. Deductive essay example.

According to the most recent results of the Healthcare industry poll, the US people are the least likely to be absolutely satisfied with the level of healthcare. The system is simply failing, experts say, and there is a range of major ways it is going that way.

Health care debates prove the industry requires changes mainly because the doctors do not receive the salaries according to the quality of the care they provide. When talking about the UK healthcare segment, 95% of doctors are paid in accordance with the quality of the services they render. In Australia the number reaches 72%. When the conversation flips to the United States, the scores in this country appear to be lower than anywhere else, namely at 30%.  At the same time, electronic media records that are known to lower the costs of healthcare and increase its quality have 89% penetration in the United Kingdom, while it’s only 28% in the US. To cut it, the country performs miserably on both metrics.

The system may go down for the reason that the majority of Americans do not have a regular physician. The reality is that of every person surveyed in the US is the least likely to report a doctor they routinely saw. That is why Americans appear to be the most likely to claim their physician hasn’t the slightest idea about how they feel. Altogether, these problems cause obvious implications for the quality of healthcare.

Why do we all need changes in the area of health care? Probably because the majority of people in the country are dissatisfied with the system available nowadays. As investigated by the health polls, the level of contentment with the current system is measured by means of three questions: Do you think your system requires light changes, as it functions quite well? Does your system require grandiose changes? Or should it be completely reconstructed? Three countries have been surveyed on the issue – the US, Canada and the UK. Americans appear to be the least likely to express relative satisfaction and the ones, who are longing for the system’s fundamental rebuilding. Only 16% of Yankees are happy.

Overall, there’s no other field in the USA where people together accept such a bad deal. Americans spend more than any other country on the military, which is definitely the mightiest on the globe. Moreover, Americans spend the most on the universities that turn to be the best in the world. At the same time, they spend the most on healthcare, but the truth is that this particular area leaves a lot to be desired, with up to 50 million of Americans, who lack insurance, required to get access to it. It’s no wonder the ‘land of liberty’ needs changes.  

References:

1. Davis K, Schoen C, Stremikis K. How the performance of the US health care system compares internationally 2010 Update. 6-1-2010. The Commonwealth Fund. Ref Type: Report
2. Nolte E, McKee CM. Measuring the health of nations: updating an earlier analysis. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27(1):58–71. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.58. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
3. Starfield B, Shi L. Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health Policy. 2002;60(3):201–218. doi: 10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00208-1. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
4. Sandy LG, Bodenheimer T, Pawlson LG, Starfield B. The political economy of US primary care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(4):1136–1145. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.1136. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
5. Fernandopulle R, Patel N. How the electronic health record did not measure up to the demands of our medical home practice. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(4):622–628. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0065. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
6. Bates DW, Bitton A. The future of health information technology in the patient-centered medical home. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(4):614–621. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0007. [PubMed] [Cross Ref]
7. Landon BE, Gill JM, Antonelli RC, Rich EC. Using evidence to inform policy: developing a policy-relevant research agenda for the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):581–583. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1303-3. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]