Deductive Essay Sample on Book Smart vs Street Smart


Whether you like it or not, street smarts will definitely kick the book smarts ass. When the question is about being a street smart, it definitely goes about having an excellent situational awareness. An individual knows how to assess the environment he’s in, what kind of people are around, as well as all angles of the situation. Living the street life means you have to learn to trust your own judgment and feelings about people and their actions. This ability, regardless of where you decide to develop it, is usually of a great value anywhere in your life even when you live too far from the street.

The most important thing about the street smart is that in this case everything comes from your own experience. In other words, you’re the one who learn how to consider what has happened to you, whether it is bad or good, ponder over it, as well as figure out how to improve it. The very first distribution between the book smarts and the street smarts lies in who stands in the knowledge center. When it’s about the street, it’s all up to you. In case with the books, it’s you absorbing someone else’s viewpoints, and even if the writer is truly amazing, you’re one step from the actual experience. At the same time, street smart means that you had a chance to put yourself at risk and got over it. Or, who knows, maybe you have scars. Once you’ll be tested again, you’ll have a bank of skills and courage to cope with life’s hard times. It is important to mention that being street smart can eventually lead you to being book smart since the street smarts tend to have a strong sense what is going to work or what isn’t, and get a feel for it accordingly.

Book smarts are for someone really good at living in accordance with the existing rules. These are individuals, who tend to get A+, make sure to sit in the front, and, of course, enjoy spending the evenings with crosswords. They prefer dealing with things that have only singular right answers. They truly believe that the volume of the knowledge they have obtained will compensate the lack of experience and ability to apply it in everyday routine. Imagining things and thinking how you can cope with them when hard times come is far from actually finding yourself in one.

Just like the good old idiot from ‘The Thin Red Line’ (the one, who outranks the things that are much more experienced and competent), the book smart tends to find it hard to see the difference between the reality and pretence and learns his lessons only when it’s too late. Things can go even worse even after the worst times when they go on searching for more printed sources instead of recognizing they do their best to boost the wrong skills: they keep looking at the world, being half blinded.

Having a deep love for books is no bad at all, but it’s the knowledge and the skills of the street smarts that best explain what is being achieved in life.


  • Heuer, Richards J. The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Washington, C.:      Center  for  the  Study  of  Intelligence,  Central  Intelligence Agency, 1999.
  • Spiller, Roger J. Sharp Corners:  Urban Operations at Century’s End. Fort Leavenworth, KS:  Combat Studies Institute, 2000.
  • Caniano, William    Uncertainty,  Intelligence  and  IPB:    The  Role  of the  Intelligence  Officer  in  Shaping  and  Synchronizing  the  Operational  Battlefield. Newport,  RI:    College  of  Naval  Command  and Staff, 1992.
  • Nolan, M., Haslam, S., Spears, R., & Oakes, P. (1999). An examination of resource-based and fit-based theories of stereotyping under cognitive load. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 641-663.
  • Nye, R. (1975) The Origins of Crowd Psychology. London: Sage.
  • Oakes, P. & Turner, J. (1990) Is limited information processing capacity the cause of social stereotyping? European Review of Social Psychology, 1, 111-35.
  • Hopkins, N. & Reicher, S. (1997a) Constructing the nation and collective mobilization: a case study of politicians’ arguments about the meaning of Scottishness In G. Barfoot (Ed.) Ethnic Stereotypes and National Purity. DQR Studies in Literature.
  • Hopkins, N. & Reicher, S. (1997b) The construction of social categories and processes of social change. In G. Breakwell & E. Lyons (Eds.) Changing European Identities. London: Butterworth.

Comments are closed.